Skoda Roomster 2006 vs Citroen Berlingo 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 16.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Roomster engine produces 34 HP more power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 115 NM more than Citroen Berlingo. Thanks to more power Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that by driving the Skoda Roomster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.81 m | |
| Skoda Roomster is 6 cm longer than the Citroen Berlingo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 624 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1780 litres | 2800 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Skoda Roomster has 174 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo. This could mean that the Skoda Roomster uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 1020 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Skoda Roomster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`840 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |