Skoda Roomster 2007 vs Citroen Berlingo 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Roomster engine produces 5 HP less power than Citroen Berlingo, but torque is 6 NM more than Citroen Berlingo. Due to the lower power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Berlingo 2002 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen Berlingo 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.82 m | |
| Skoda Roomster is 6 cm longer than the Citroen Berlingo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 624 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1780 litres | 2800 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Skoda Roomster has 174 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo. This could mean that the Skoda Roomster uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 1020 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Skoda Roomster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`840 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |