Skoda Roomster 2006 vs Volkswagen Touran 2006
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 195 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
Skoda Roomster engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Despite less power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that by driving the Skoda Roomster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
1240 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
980 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.20 m | 4.41 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.64 m | |
Skoda Roomster is smaller. Skoda Roomster is 21 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touran, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 695 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1780 litres | 1989 litres | |
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Skoda Roomster has 245 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 209 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran, which means Skoda Roomster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 2`210 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |