Skoda Roomster 2006 vs Citroen Berlingo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 20.4 seconds | |
| Skoda Roomster engine produces 5 HP less power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Citroen Berlingo. Despite less power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.9 | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Roomster consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that by driving the Skoda Roomster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.81 m | |
| Skoda Roomster is 6 cm longer than the Citroen Berlingo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 624 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1780 litres | 2800 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Skoda Roomster uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 1020 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Skoda Roomster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`725 kg | 1`880 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`210 kg | 1`269 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 515 kg | 611 kg | |
| Skoda Roomster load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem less than Citroen Berlingo. Therefore, Citroen Berlingo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |