Skoda Roomster 2006 vs Subaru Impreza 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Subaru Impreza is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Roomster engine produces 74 HP less power than Subaru Impreza, whereas torque is 54 NM less than Subaru Impreza. Due to the lower power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Impreza, which means that by driving the Skoda Roomster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Impreza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru Impreza 2005 2.0 engine: The Subaru EJ204 is a naturally aspirated 2.0-liter boxer engine producing around 150–160 hp, widely used in models such as Impreza, Legacy, and Forester between 1999 and 2015. It is generally regarded as a durable engine, but like many units from the EJ ... More about Subaru Impreza 2005 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller, but higher. Skoda Roomster is 26 cm shorter than the Subaru Impreza, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1780 litres | 1266 litres | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Subaru Impreza may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 514 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.7 metres less than that of the Subaru Impreza, which means Skoda Roomster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`670 kg | 1`820 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`155 kg | 1`360 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 515 kg | 460 kg | |
| Skoda Roomster load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Subaru Impreza. Therefore, Skoda Roomster is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Subaru Impreza has
| |