Skoda Roomster 2006 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 16.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Roomster engine produces 21 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.45 m | |
| Skoda Roomster is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 3 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 426 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1780 litres | 1225 litres | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Roomster has 24 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The Skoda Fabia may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 555 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`670 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Roomster has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Roomster quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |