Skoda Roomster 2006 vs Skoda Fabia 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| Skoda Roomster engine produces 1 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.50 m | |
| Skoda Roomster is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1780 litres | 1226 litres | |
| Skoda Roomster has 30 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 554 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Skoda Roomster can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`670 | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |