Skoda Roomster 2006 vs Renault Clio 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Roomster engine produces 11 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.51 m | |
| Skoda Roomster and Renault Clio are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1780 litres | no data | |
| Skoda Roomster has 11 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Clio, which means Skoda Roomster can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`670 | 1`595 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Renault Clio has
| |