Skoda Roomster 2006 vs Ford Fusion 2002
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.9 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Fusion is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Roomster engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Fusion, but torque is 2 NM more than Ford Fusion. Due to the lower power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.53 m | |
| Skoda Roomster is 18 cm longer than the Ford Fusion, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1780 litres | 1175 litres | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage capacity. Skoda Roomster has 113 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fusion. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 605 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Fusion, which means Skoda Roomster can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fusion has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Ford Fusion has
| |