Skoda Roomster 2006 vs Citroen Berlingo 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.9 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Roomster engine produces 10 HP less power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Citroen Berlingo. Due to the lower power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that by driving the Skoda Roomster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.81 m | |
| Skoda Roomster is 6 cm longer than the Citroen Berlingo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 624 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1780 litres | 2800 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Skoda Roomster uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen Berlingo (by 1020 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Skoda Roomster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`665 kg | 1`780 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`150 kg | 1`125 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 515 kg | 655 kg | |
| Skoda Roomster load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Citroen Berlingo. Therefore, Citroen Berlingo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |