Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Volkswagen Golf 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Roomster engine produces 35 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Due to the lower power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Skoda Roomster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Golf 2009 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Golf 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller, but higher. Skoda Roomster is 32 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1495 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space. Skoda Roomster has 25 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Skoda Roomster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`777 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |