Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Skoda Roomster and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, but Skoda Roomster torque is 75 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Skoda Roomster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Skoda Fabia 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.50 m | |
| Skoda Roomster is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Skoda Roomster can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`777 | 1`639 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |