Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Roomster engine produces 30 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 3.8 | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Roomster consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.50 m | |
| Skoda Roomster is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Skoda Roomster can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`777 kg | 1`664 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`322 kg | 1`209 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 455 kg | 455 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |