Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Volvo V50 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Roomster engine produces 5 HP less power than Volvo V50, but torque is 10 NM more than Volvo V50. Despite less power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that by driving the Skoda Roomster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller, but higher. Skoda Roomster is 31 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 417 litres | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Roomster has 63 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The Volvo V50 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo V50, which means Skoda Roomster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`777 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V50 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |