Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Renault Clio 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Roomster engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller, but higher. Skoda Roomster is 1 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 439 litres | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Roomster has 41 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`777 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Renault Clio has
| |