Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Renault Clio 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Roomster engine produces 15 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 3.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller, but higher. Skoda Roomster is 5 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 443 litres | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Roomster has 37 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`777 | 1`711 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Roomster has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Clio, so Skoda Roomster quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Renault Clio has
| |