Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Peugeot 308 2011

 
Skoda Roomster
2010 - 2015
Peugeot 308
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 105 HP112 HP
Torque: 250 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds11.9 seconds
Skoda Roomster engine produces 7 HP less power than Peugeot 308, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Peugeot 308. Despite less power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.74.5
Skoda Roomster consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 308, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1170 km in combined cycle1330 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1530 km on highway
Peugeot 308 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Peugeot 308 2011 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ...  More about Peugeot 308 2011 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.21 m4.50 m
Width: 1.68 m1.82 m
Height: 1.61 m1.56 m
Skoda Roomster is smaller, but higher.
Skoda Roomster is 29 cm shorter than the Peugeot 308, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres508 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data2149 litres
Peugeot 308 has more luggage space.
Skoda Roomster has 28 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 308.
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 308, which means Skoda Roomster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`777 kg2`150 kg
Net weight:1`322 kg1`488 kg
Load capacity:455 kg662 kg
Skoda Roomster load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 45 procentiem less than Peugeot 308. Therefore, Peugeot 308 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Skoda Roomster has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 308 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 32003000
Pros and Cons: Skoda Roomster has
  • fewer faults
Peugeot 308 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv