Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Kia Ceed 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Skoda Roomster) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Kia Ceed) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Roomster engine produces 15 HP more power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 113 NM more than Kia Ceed. Thanks to more power Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Skoda Roomster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller, but higher. Skoda Roomster is 28 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 534 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1664 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage space. Skoda Roomster has 54 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.2 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`777 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |