Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Citroen Berlingo 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Roomster engine produces 15 HP more power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Citroen Berlingo. Thanks to more power Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1530 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller. Skoda Roomster is 17 cm shorter than the Citroen Berlingo, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 675 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3000 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage space. Skoda Roomster has 195 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.5 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Skoda Roomster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`777 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |