Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Citroen Berlingo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Skoda Roomster engine produces 7 HP less power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Citroen Berlingo. Despite less power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that by driving the Skoda Roomster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Citroen Berlingo 2012 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen Berlingo 2012 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller. Skoda Roomster is 17 cm shorter than the Citroen Berlingo, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 675 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3000 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage space. Skoda Roomster has 195 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.5 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Skoda Roomster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`777 | 2`065 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |