Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Citroen Berlingo 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Skoda Roomster engine produces 15 HP less power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Citroen Berlingo. Despite less power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller. Skoda Roomster is 17 cm shorter than the Citroen Berlingo, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 100 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 100 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 480 litres | 675 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3000 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Citroen Berlingo has more luggage space (by 195 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 1 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Skoda Roomster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`777 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |