Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Skoda Fabia 2010

 
Skoda Roomster
2010 - 2015
Skoda Fabia
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 105 HP105 HP
Torque: 175 NM175 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds10.3 seconds
Skoda Roomster and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.75.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1020 km on highway
790 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 6 years6 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.21 m4.25 m
Width: 1.68 m1.64 m
Height: 1.61 m1.50 m
Skoda Roomster is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres480 litres
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Skoda Roomster can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7261`639
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 42003800
Pros and Cons: Skoda Roomster has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Skoda Fabia has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv