Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Skoda Rapid 2015
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Roomster engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Thanks to more power Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller, but higher. Skoda Roomster is 27 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1490 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space. Skoda Roomster has 70 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.4 metres less than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Skoda Roomster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`726 | 1`659 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Rapid has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Rapid quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |