Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 16.7 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Roomster engine produces 26 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 52 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Skoda Roomster 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifespan is relatively low. There tends to be increased vibration at idling speed. Problems with the fuel pressure pump may be the first sign of a petrol smell in the oil. ... More about Skoda Roomster 2010 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.50 m | |
| Skoda Roomster is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Skoda Roomster can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`676 | 1`565 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |