Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Skoda Rapid 2012

 
Skoda Roomster
2010 - 2015
Skoda Rapid
2012 - 2017
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 86 HP75 HP
Torque: 160 NM112 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.6 seconds13.9 seconds
Skoda Roomster is more dynamic to drive.
Skoda Roomster engine produces 11 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Thanks to more power Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.75.9
Skoda Roomster consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that by driving the Skoda Roomster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1190 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.21 m4.48 m
Width: 1.68 m1.71 m
Height: 1.61 m1.46 m
Skoda Roomster is smaller, but higher.
Skoda Roomster is 27 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 15 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1490 litres
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space.
Skoda Roomster has 70 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid.
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Rapid.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6761`595
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Skoda Rapid has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Rapid quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 42007000
Pros and Cons: Skoda Roomster has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Skoda Rapid has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv