Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Volvo V50 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Roomster engine produces 31 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that by driving the Skoda Roomster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller, but higher. Skoda Roomster is 31 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 417 litres | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Roomster has 63 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The Volvo V50 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo V50, which means Skoda Roomster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V50 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |