Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Citroen Berlingo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.9 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Roomster engine produces 29 HP less power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Citroen Berlingo. Due to the lower power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Roomster consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that by driving the Skoda Roomster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Roomster consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller. Skoda Roomster is 17 cm shorter than the Citroen Berlingo, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 675 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3000 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage space. Skoda Roomster has 195 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.5 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Skoda Roomster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |