Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Skoda Fabia 2010

 
Skoda Roomster
2010 - 2015
Skoda Fabia
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Diesel1.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 75 HP75 HP
Torque: 180 NM180 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.5 seconds14.3 seconds
Skoda Roomster and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.53.8
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Skoda Roomster consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1220 km in combined cycle1180 km in combined cycle
1370 km on highway1360 km on highway

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 16 years16 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.21 m4.25 m
Width: 1.68 m1.64 m
Height: 1.61 m1.50 m
Skoda Roomster is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres480 litres
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Skoda Roomster can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7631`664
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 40003800
Pros and Cons:
    Skoda Fabia has
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv