Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 180 NM | 180 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.5 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
Skoda Roomster and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 3.8 | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Roomster consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
1370 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 16 years | 16 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.21 m | 4.25 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.50 m | |
Skoda Roomster is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 480 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Skoda Roomster can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`763 | 1`664 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |