Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 86 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 132 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Roomster engine produces 94 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 118 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.2 | |
Skoda Roomster consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
1030 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.21 m | 4.25 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.50 m | |
Skoda Roomster is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 480 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Skoda Roomster can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`664 | 1`713 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3600 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |