Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Skoda Rapid 2012
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Rapid is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Roomster engine produces 36 HP less power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 68 NM less than Skoda Rapid. Due to the lower power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.8 | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Roomster consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Skoda Rapid 2012 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller, but higher. Skoda Roomster is 27 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1490 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space. Skoda Roomster has 70 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`664 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Rapid has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Rapid quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |