Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Roomster engine produces 15 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.2 | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Roomster consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Roomster could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.50 m | |
| Skoda Roomster is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Skoda Roomster can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`777 | 1`694 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |