Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Roomster engine produces 50 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Skoda Roomster reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller. Skoda Roomster and Skoda Yeti are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`777 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |