Skoda Roomster 2006 vs Skoda Fabia 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 105 HP | 60 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 240 NM | 108 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 16.9 seconds | 10.4 - 16.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 7.9 | 4.8 - 7.5 | |
|
Skoda Roomster petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Skoda Roomster equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.50 m | |
| Skoda Roomster is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1780 litres | 1485 litres | |
| Skoda Roomster has 30 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 295 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Skoda Roomster can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`721 | ~ 1`626 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |