Skoda Roomster 2006 vs Ford Fusion 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 105 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 240 NM | 110 - 204 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 16.9 seconds | 10.9 - 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 7.9 | 4.4 - 7.7 | |
|
Skoda Roomster petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fusion. On average, Skoda Roomster equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.53 m | |
| Skoda Roomster is 18 cm longer than the Ford Fusion, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1780 litres | 1175 litres | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage capacity. Skoda Roomster has 113 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fusion. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 605 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Fusion, which means Skoda Roomster can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`721 | ~ 1`623 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Ford Fusion has
| |