Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Skoda Rapid 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 - 105 HP | 75 - 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 250 NM | 112 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 15.9 seconds | 9.5 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.4 | 3.6 - 5.9 | |
|
Skoda Roomster petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Rapid. On average, Skoda Roomster equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller, but higher. Skoda Roomster is 27 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1490 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space. Skoda Roomster has 70 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.4 metres less than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Skoda Roomster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`716 | ~ 1`667 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |