Skoda Roomster 2010 vs Citroen Berlingo 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 - 105 HP | 75 - 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 250 NM | 152 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 15.9 seconds | 12.1 - 19.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.4 | 4.4 - 7.3 | |
|
Skoda Roomster petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Berlingo. On average, Skoda Roomster equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Skoda Roomster is smaller. Skoda Roomster is 17 cm shorter than the Citroen Berlingo, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Roomster is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 675 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3000 litres | |
|
Citroen Berlingo has more luggage space. Skoda Roomster has 195 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Roomster is 0.5 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Skoda Roomster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`716 | ~ 2`036 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Roomster has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |