Skoda Rapid 2012 vs Ford Focus 2014

 
Skoda Rapid
2012 - 2017
Ford Focus
2014 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP120 HP
Torque: 250 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds10.5 seconds
Skoda Rapid engine produces 5 HP less power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Focus. Despite less power, Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.83.8
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres53 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1440 km in combined cycle1390 km in combined cycle
1660 km on highway1550 km on highway
1030 km with real consumption1000 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.36 m
Width: 1.71 m1.82 m
Height: 1.46 m1.48 m
Skoda Rapid is 13 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres277 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1490 litres1062 litres
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Rapid has 273 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 428 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.8 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Skoda Rapid can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7401`900
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

low
Skoda Rapid has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Rapid quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 62006400
Pros and Cons: Skoda Rapid has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv