Skoda Rapid 2012 vs Skoda Scala 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Scala is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Rapid engine produces 10 HP less power than Skoda Scala, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Rapid consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Scala, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Rapid could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Rapid consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Scala. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1480 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 1050 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Scala can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Scala version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Skoda Rapid is 12 cm longer than the Skoda Scala, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 467 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1490 litres | 1410 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity. Skoda Rapid has 83 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Scala. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 80 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.3 metres less than that of the Skoda Scala. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`725 kg | 1`760 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`265 kg | 1`239 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 460 kg | 521 kg | |
| Skoda Rapid load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Skoda Scala. Therefore, Skoda Scala is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Scala is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Scala scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Skoda Scala has
| |