Skoda Rapid 2012 vs Fiat Tipo 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Skoda Rapid is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Rapid engine produces 10 HP more power than Fiat Tipo, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Fiat Tipo. Thanks to more power Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Tipo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Rapid consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Rapid could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1350 km in combined cycle | |
| 1480 km on highway | 1510 km on highway | ||
| 1050 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
| Skoda Rapid is 12 cm longer than the Fiat Tipo, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1490 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity. Skoda Rapid has 110 litres more trunk space than the Fiat Tipo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.3 metres less than that of the Fiat Tipo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`725 | 1`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Fiat Tipo has
| |