Skoda Rapid 2012 vs Citroen C4 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Rapid is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Rapid engine produces 13 HP more power than Citroen C4, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Citroen C4. Thanks to more power Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Rapid consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Rapid could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Rapid consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1420 km in combined cycle | |
| 1480 km on highway | 1660 km on highway | ||
| 1050 km with real consumption | 1170 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
| Skoda Rapid is 15 cm longer than the Citroen C4, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1490 litres | 1183 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity. Skoda Rapid has 170 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 307 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C4, which means Skoda Rapid can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`725 | 1`790 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C4 is better rated in child safety tests. The Citroen C4 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Skoda Rapid has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Rapid quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |