Skoda Rapid 2012 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Rapid engine produces 4 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Rapid consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Rapid could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Rapid consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Skoda Rapid 2012 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifespan is relatively low. There tends to be increased vibration at idling speed. Problems with the fuel pressure pump may be the first sign of a petrol smell in the oil. ... More about Skoda Rapid 2012 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Skoda Rapid is 23 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1490 litres | 1395 litres | |
| Skoda Rapid has 20 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 95 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`615 | 1`588 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |