Skoda Rapid 2012 vs Nissan Pulsar 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| Skoda Rapid engine produces 29 HP less power than Nissan Pulsar, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Nissan Pulsar. Despite less power, Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Skoda Rapid 2012 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifespan is relatively low. There tends to be increased vibration at idling speed. Problems with the fuel pressure pump may be the first sign of a petrol smell in the oil. ... More about Skoda Rapid 2012 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
| Skoda Rapid is 10 cm longer than the Nissan Pulsar, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1490 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity. Skoda Rapid has 165 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Pulsar. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`615 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Rapid scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Nissan Pulsar has
| |