Skoda Rapid 2012 vs Seat Toledo 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Rapid is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Rapid engine produces 30 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 63 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.9 | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Rapid consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Skoda Rapid over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Skoda Rapid 2012 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Rapid and Seat Toledo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1490 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Rapid is 0.8 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Skoda Rapid can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`635 | 1`595 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
| |