Skoda Rapid 2015 vs Skoda Scala 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Scala is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Rapid engine produces 25 HP less power than Skoda Scala, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Skoda Scala. Due to the lower power, Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Rapid consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Scala, which means that by driving the Skoda Rapid over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Rapid consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Scala. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1520 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1610 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 1100 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Scala can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Scala version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Skoda Rapid is 12 cm longer than the Skoda Scala, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 467 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1490 litres | 1410 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity. Skoda Rapid has 83 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Scala. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 80 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`694 kg | 1`760 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`159 kg | 1`239 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 535 kg | 521 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Scala is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Scala scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Skoda Scala has
| |