Skoda Rapid 2019 vs Mazda 3 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Rapid is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Rapid engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda 3, but torque is 5 NM more than Mazda 3. Despite less power, Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.0 | |
| Skoda Rapid consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Rapid could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Skoda Rapid is 5 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 295 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1460 litres | 1019 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity. Skoda Rapid has 235 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 441 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`695 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |