Skoda Rapid 2019 vs Skoda Rapid 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Rapid 2012 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Rapid 2019 engine produces 12 HP less power than Skoda Rapid 2012, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Skoda Rapid 2012. Due to the lower power, Skoda Rapid 2019 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Rapid 2019 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Rapid 2019 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Rapid 2019 could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Rapid 2019 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid 2012. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Skoda Rapid 2012 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Rapid 2019 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Rapid 2012, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Rapid 2019 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1460 litres | 1490 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Skoda Rapid 2019 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid 2012 (by 30 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`670 kg | 1`690 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`210 kg | 1`151 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 460 kg | 539 kg | |
| Skoda Rapid 2019 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Skoda Rapid 2012. Therefore, Skoda Rapid 2012 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |