Skoda Rapid 2019 vs Skoda Rapid 2012

 
Skoda Rapid
2019 - 2022
Skoda Rapid
2012 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP122 HP
Torque: 155 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds9.5 seconds
Skoda Rapid 2012 is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Rapid 2019 engine produces 32 HP less power than Skoda Rapid 2012, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Skoda Rapid 2012. Due to the lower power, Skoda Rapid 2019 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.05.8
Skoda Rapid 2019 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Rapid 2019 could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle940 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1340 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Skoda Rapid 2012 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common.

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.48 m
Width: 1.71 m1.71 m
Height: 1.47 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Rapid 2019 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Rapid 2012, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Rapid 2019 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1460 litres1490 litres
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Skoda Rapid 2019 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid 2012 (by 30 litres).
Turning diameter: no data10.2 meters
Gross weight: 1`655 kg1`690 kg
Net weight:1`195 kg1`151 kg
Load capacity:460 kg539 kg
Skoda Rapid 2019 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Skoda Rapid 2012. Therefore, Skoda Rapid 2012 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data6200
Pros and Cons:
    Skoda Rapid has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv