Skoda Rapid 2019 vs Mazda 3 2019

 
Skoda Rapid
2019 - 2022
Mazda 3
2019 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP120 HP
Torque: 155 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds11.3 seconds
Skoda Rapid engine produces 30 HP less power than Mazda 3, but torque is 5 NM more than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.06.1
Skoda Rapid consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Skoda Rapid over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1010 km on highway
Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.46 m
Width: 1.71 m1.80 m
Height: 1.47 m1.44 m
Skoda Rapid is 5 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Rapid is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres295 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1460 litres1019 litres
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Rapid has 235 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 441 litres).
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight: 1`655 kgno data
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): no data21 200
Pros and Cons: Skoda Rapid has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv