Skoda Rapid 2019 vs Skoda Fabia 2020

 
Skoda Rapid
2019 - 2022
Skoda Fabia
2020 - 2021
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 125 HP95 HP
Torque: 200 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds11.1 seconds
Skoda Rapid is more dynamic to drive.
Skoda Rapid engine produces 30 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.45.0
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Skoda Rapid consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Rapid could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle900 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway1020 km on highway
Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Skoda Rapid 2019 1.4 engine: The engine is reliable, however, owners frequently report excessive oil consumption, which is usually linked to piston ring issues. Loss of power is another common complaint. It's advised against maintaining ...  More about Skoda Rapid 2019 1.4 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.00 m
Width: 1.71 m1.73 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Skoda Rapid is 52 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres330 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1460 litres1150 litres
Skoda Rapid has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Rapid has 200 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 310 litres).
Turning diameter: no data10.4 meters
Gross weight: 1`715 kg1`615 kg
Net weight:1`255 kg1`085 kg
Load capacity:460 kg530 kg
Skoda Rapid load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Skoda Fabia. Therefore, Skoda Fabia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data7800
Pros and Cons: Skoda Rapid has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv