Skoda Rapid 2017 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Rapid is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Rapid engine produces 26 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Skoda Rapid reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 3.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Rapid consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Rapid could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Rapid consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1340 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 1070 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Rapid is 5 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1395 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Skoda Rapid has 115 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. This could mean that the Skoda Rapid uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`635 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Rapid has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |